[1]HAO Jianlong,DU Yinhuan,XUE Lingrong,et al.A complex-valued multi-domain loss fusion network for time series forecasting[J].CAAI transactions on intelligent systems,2026,21(5):1211-1220.[doi:10.11992/tis.202511025]
Copy
CAAI transactions on intelligent systems[ISSN 1673-4785/CN 23-1538/TP] Volume:
21
Number of periods:
2026 5
Page number:
1211-1220
Column:
学术论文—机器学习
Public date:
2026-09-05
- Title:
-
A complex-valued multi-domain loss fusion network for time series forecasting
- Author(s):
-
HAO Jianlong; DU Yinhuan; XUE Lingrong; ZHANG Wei; LI Ruipu
-
School of Information, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, Taiyuan 030006, China
-
- Keywords:
-
time series forecasting; complex-valued neural networks; loss function; complex attention mechanism; fast Fourier transform; phase aware; time-frequency fusion; dynamic gradient balancing
- CLC:
-
TP301.6
- DOI:
-
10.11992/tis.202511025
- Abstract:
-
Time series forecasting possesses extensive application value in critical fields such as power systems, meteorology, and transportation. Traditional models are constrained by single temporal domain loss functions, phase information loss in the real number domain, and fixed-weight optimization imbalance, making it difficult to adapt to complex temporal characteristics. This paper proposes a complex-valued multi-domain loss fusion time series prediction network (CFuseTS). It adopts complex-valued convolution and conjugate complex-valued attention to jointly capture the amplitude and phase features of time series data, breaking the inherent limitations of real-valued modeling. Meanwhile, a multi-domain synergistic loss (MDSL) module is constructed to implement joint constraints on multivariate time series, and the dynamic gradient equalizer (DGE) dynamically adjusts the weights of each domain in real time to mitigate optimization bias from conventional fixed-weight strategies. Experiments on 8 benchmark datasets show that CFuseTS reduces mean squared error (MSE) by an average of 6.51% and a maximum of 14.78% for all predicted lengths (96/192/336/720 time steps) compared to existing advanced methods, fully validating its effectiveness and generalization ability.