[1]许灵毓,钟义信,陈志成.社交机器人对社会舆论的影响因素研究[J].智能系统学报,2024,19(1):122-131.[doi:10.11992/tis.202305044]
XU Lingyu,ZHONG Yixin,CHEN Zhicheng.Research on the influence factors of social robots on social opinions[J].CAAI Transactions on Intelligent Systems,2024,19(1):122-131.[doi:10.11992/tis.202305044]
点击复制
XU Lingyu,ZHONG Yixin,CHEN Zhicheng.Research on the influence factors of social robots on social opinions[J].CAAI Transactions on Intelligent Systems,2024,19(1):122-131.[doi:10.11992/tis.202305044]
社交机器人对社会舆论的影响因素研究
《智能系统学报》[ISSN 1673-4785/CN 23-1538/TP] 卷:
19
期数:
2024年第1期
页码:
122-131
栏目:
学术论文—机器人
出版日期:
2024-01-05
- Title:
- Research on the influence factors of social robots on social opinions
- Keywords:
- social robots; social media; public opinion; opinion influence; influence factor; artificial intelligence; social media; public opinion formation mechanism
- 分类号:
- TP391
- 文献标志码:
- 2024-01-17
- 摘要:
- 近年来，社交机器人已经成为人工智能领域的一个最新的研究方向。由于新冠疫情、俄乌冲突、英国脱欧等一系列重大事件中，社交机器人对公众舆论产生了重要影响，学界对社交机器人的关注度日渐升高。本文提出了基于社交机器人的社会舆论形成过程模型，分为舆论出现、争夺影响力、舆论形成3个阶段，社交机器人可以在3个阶段介入和影响。研究了社交机器人的级联效应、工作原理、影响因素，指出媒体类型、事件模糊性和争议性、受众群体等均是影响社会舆论的主要因素。调查问卷实验与案例分析表明：社交机器人对信息传播速度、网民意见/倾向的形成等具有显著影响，实验数据对今后研究具有重要参考意义。
- Abstract:
- In recent years, social robots have become the latest research direction in the field of artificial intelligence. Due to a series of major events such as the COVID-19 epidemic, the Russia-Ukraine conflict, and Brexit, social robots have had an important impact on public opinions, and the academic community has paid more attention to social robots. The research work includes: proposing a social opinion formation process model based on social robots, which is divided into three stages: public opinions emerging, competing for influence, and forming public opinions. Social robots can intervene and influence in these three stages; Studying the cascading effect, working principle, and influencing factors of social robots, and pointing out that media type, ambiguity and controversy of events, audience group, etc. are the main factors affecting social public opinions; The questionnaire, experiment and case study show that social bots have a significant impact on the speed of information spreading and the formation of netizen’s opinions/tendencies. The experimental data has important reference significance for future research.
- 参考文献/References:
-
[1] 王俊秀, 高文珺, 陈满琪, 等. 新冠肺炎疫情下的社会心态调查报告: 基于2020年1月24日-25日的调查数据分析[J]. 国家治理, 2020(S1): 55–64
WANG Junxiu, GAO Wenjun, CHEN Manqi, et al. A survey report on social mentality under the epidemic situation in COVID-19—based on the analysis of survey data from January 24th to 25th, 2020[J]. Governance, 2020(S1): 55–64
[2] 王晗啸, 黄梦静. 社交平台的话语争夺: 中英文语境下政治机器人涉华议题舆论干预比较研究[J]. 传媒观察, 2022(12): 54–60
WANG Hanxiao, HUANG Mengjing. Fighting for discourse on the social media: a comparative study on public opinion interventions of china-related issues made in Chinese and English discourse by political bots[J]. Media observer, 2022(12): 54–60
[3] 师文, 陈昌凤. 分布与互动模式: 社交机器人操纵Twitter上的中国议题研究[J]. 国际新闻界, 2020, 42(5): 61–80
SHI Wen, CHEN Changfeng. Distribution and interaction patterns: how social bots manipulate the chinese-related issues on twitter[J]. Chinese journal of journalism & communication, 2020, 42(5): 61–80
[4] BESSI A, FERRARA E. Social bots distort the 2016 U. S. Presidential election online discussion[J]. First Monday, 2016, 21: 5.
[5] CHENG Chun, LUO Yun, YU Changbin. Dynamic mechanism of social bots interfering with public opinion in network[J]. Physica A:statistical mechanics and its applications, 2020, 551: 124163.
[6] CHENG Chun, LUO Yun, YU Changbin, et al. Social bots and mass media manipulated public opinion through dual opinion climate[J]. Chinese physics B, 2022, 31(1): 018701.
[7] 甘惜分. 新闻舆论与社会控制: 读《基础舆论学》[J]. 中国图书评论, 1989(3): 23–25
GAN Xifen. News public opinion and social control—reading basic public opinion[J]. China book review, 1989(3): 23–25
[8] 郭赫男, 解天滋. 李普曼的“拟态环境”理论的传播学意义探微[J]. 井冈山学院学报, 2005, 26(6): 9–12
GUO Henan, XIE Tianzi. An investigation into the significance of walter lippmann’s“pseudo-environment”Theory in mass communication studies[J]. Journal of Jinggangshan Normal College, 2005, 26(6): 9–12
[9] WANG Guanghui, WANG Yufei, LIU Kaidi, et al. Multidimensional influencing factors of public opinion information dissemination in social media: evidence from Weibo dataset[J]. International journal of modern physics B, 2019, 33(31): 1950375.
[10] 王邵军, 李晓冰. Z世代消费新主流影视的原因与趋势: 基于使用与满足理论[J]. 经济与管理评论, 2022, 38(5): 86–96
WANG Shaojun, LI Xiaobing. Reasons and trends in generation Z’s consumption of new mainstream film and television—based on use and satisfaction theory[J]. Review of economy and management, 2022, 38(5): 86–96
[11] WANG Xin, SIRIANNI A D, TANG Shaoting, et al. Public discourse and social network echo chambers driven by socio-cognitive biases[J]. Physical review X, 2020, 10(4): 041042.
[12] BAUMANN F, LORENZ-SPREEN P, SOKOLOV I M, et al. Modeling echo chambers and polarization dynamics in social networks[J]. Physical review letters, 2020, 124(4): 048301.
[13] SOHN D, GEIDNER N. Collective dynamics of the spiral of silence: the role of ego-network size[J]. International journal of public opinion research, 2016, 28(1): 25–45.
[14] MUTZ D C. Facilitating communication across lines of political difference: the role of mass media[J]. American political science review, 2001, 95(1): 97–114.
[15] SOHN D. Spiral of silence in the social media era: a simulation approach to the interplay between social networks and mass media[J]. Communication research, 2022, 49(1): 139–166.
[16] 匡文波, 周倜. 论网络舆论风暴公式[J]. 国际新闻界, 2019, 41(12): 131–153
KUANG Wenbo, ZHOU Ti. Formula of Internet public opinion storm[J]. Chinese journal of journalism & communication, 2019, 41(12): 131–153
[17] BAIL C A, ARGYLE L P, BROWN T W, et al. Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization[J]. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences of the United States of America, 2018, 115(37): 9216–9221.
[18] 夏倩芳, 仲野. 中国网民的新闻消费习惯与信息茧房状况: 不同教育人群的素描和比较[J]. 新闻记者, 2022(12): 3–15,96
XIA Qianfang, ZHONG Ye. News consumption habits and information cocoon of netizens in China—sketch and comparison of different educational groups[J]. Shanghai journalism review, 2022(12): 3–15,96
[19] 师文, 陈昌凤. 社交机器人在新闻扩散中的角色和行为模式研究: 基于《纽约时报》“修例”风波报道在Twitter上扩散的分析[J]. 新闻与传播研究, 2020, 27(5): 5–20,126
SHI Wen, CHEN Changfeng. The role and behavior pattern of social bots in the diffusion of news: an analysis of the spread of coverages of Hong Kong’s anti-amendment bill campaign by the New York times on twitter[J]. Journalism & communication, 2020, 27(5): 5–20,126
[20] WANG Wenxian, CHEN Xingshu, JIANG Shuyu, et al. Exploring the construction and infiltration strategies of social bots in sina microblog[J]. Scientific reports, 2020, 10: 19821.
[21] BILGE L, STRUFE T, BALZAROTTI D, et al. All your contacts are belong to us: automated identity theft attacks on social networks[C]//Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World wide web. New York: ACM, 2009: 551?560.
[22] MIN Yong, JIANG Tingjun, JIN Cheng, et al. Endogenetic structure of filter bubble in social networks[J]. Royal Society open science, 2019, 6(11): 190868.
[23] AIELLO L M, DEPLANO M, SCHIFANELLA R, et al. People are strange when you’re a stranger: impact and influence of bots on social networks[J]. Proceedings of the international AAAI conference on web and social media, 2021, 6(1): 10–17.
[24] FERRARA E. What types of COVID-19 conspiracies are populated by Twitter bots?[J]. First Monday, 2020: 1-25.
[25] SHI Wen, LIU Diyi, YANG Jing, et al. Social bots’ sentiment engagement in health emergencies: a topic-based analysis of the COVID-19 pandemic discussions on twitter[J]. International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020, 17(22): 8701.
[26] SUáREZ-LLEDó V, áLVAREZ-GáLVEZ J. Assessing the role of social bots during the COVID-19 pandemic: infodemic, disagreement, and criticism[J]. Journal of medical internet research, 2022, 24(8): e36085.
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2023-05-29。
基金项目:中国教育技术协会“十三五”规划重点课题([2017]QY119).
作者简介:许灵毓，博士研究生，主要研究方向为科学哲学、社交网络机器人、科学传播与社会舆论影响。E-mail：xulingyu20@yeah.net;钟义信，教授，博士生导师，发展中世界工程技术科学院院士、美国纽约科学院院士，中国人工智能学会原理事长，北京邮电大学原副校长，主要研究方向为通信理论、信息科学、人工智能。主持省部级和国家级项目数十项，提出和建立“全信息理论”“全信息自然语言理解理论”“机制主义人工智能统一理论”及“机器知行学”理论，发现和总结了“信息转换与智能创生定律”，获得“有突出贡献的归国留学人员”、 “全国优秀教师”等称号；获得首届中国人工智能学会吴文俊科学技术成就奖和首届中国电子学会信息理论杰出贡献奖；现任国际信息研究学会主席。发表学术论文500余篇，出版学术专著18部。E-mail：zyx@bupt.edu.cn。;陈志成，教授，博士，博士后，英国访问学者，任中国人工智能学会基础专委会副主任，国际信息研究学会副主席，主要研究方向为人工智能机器人、泛逻辑学。主持和参与各项课题 20 余项，授权专利和软件著作权 30 余项。获“优秀教师”“优秀共产党员”“全国十二五科技创新先进个人”中央电视台“2016中国创业榜样”等奖项。发表学术论文50余篇，出版专著3部。E-mail：chenzc20@yeah.net
通讯作者:陈志成. E-mail：chenzc20@yeah.net
更新日期/Last Update:
1900-01-01