[1]郝勇,贾登辉,李晨洋,等.基于事件触发的预设时间航天器轨迹跟踪控制[J].智能系统学报,2024,19(3):661-669.[doi:10.11992/tis.202207017]
HAO Yong,JIA Denghui,LI Chenyang,et al.Event trigger-based prescribed-time tracking control of spacecraft[J].CAAI Transactions on Intelligent Systems,2024,19(3):661-669.[doi:10.11992/tis.202207017]
点击复制
HAO Yong,JIA Denghui,LI Chenyang,et al.Event trigger-based prescribed-time tracking control of spacecraft[J].CAAI Transactions on Intelligent Systems,2024,19(3):661-669.[doi:10.11992/tis.202207017]
基于事件触发的预设时间航天器轨迹跟踪控制
《智能系统学报》[ISSN 1673-4785/CN 23-1538/TP] 卷:
19
期数:
2024年第3期
页码:
661-669
栏目:
学术论文—智能系统
出版日期:
2024-05-05
- Title:
- Event trigger-based prescribed-time tracking control of spacecraft
- Keywords:
- limited communication; trajectory tracking; event trigger; prescribed time; backstepping control; dynamic gain; networked control system; dynamic parameter
- 分类号:
- TP29；O231
- 文献标志码:
- 2023-10-18
- 摘要:
- 针对通信受限条件下的航天器轨迹跟踪问题，提出了一种基于事件触发的预设时间控制算法。为了满足不同任务场景下对航天器快速性的要求，本文设计了一种预设时间轨迹跟踪控制算法。结合反步控制理论及预设时间动态增益，最终实现轨迹跟踪系统的预设时间收敛。作为一种典型的网络化控制系统，航天器在执行任务过程中可能会受到自身通信能力的限制，造成通信阻塞、时延和丢包等问题。为此，本文提出了一种基于动态参数的事件触发算法，在保证系统控制精度的同时，一定程度上避免了控制中心与航天器本体间不必要的通信资源消耗。相比于传统的静态事件触发算法，文中基于动态参数的事件触发算法在减少通信频率方面更具优势。通过理论分析和仿真实验验证所提控制算法的有效性。
- Abstract:
- An event trigger-based prescribed-time control algorithm is proposed for trajectory tracking of a spacecraft under communication constraints. First, to endow the spacecraft with rapidity under different task scenarios, a prescribed-time trajectory-tracking control algorithm is designed, which finally achieves the prescribed-time convergence of the trajectory-tracking control system by combining the backstepping control theory and dynamic gain of the prescribed time. Second, as a typical networked control system, the spacecraft may be limited by its own communication capability in the process of task implementation, which will lead to communication congestion, time delay, packet loss, and so on. Therefore, an event-trigger algorithm is proposed based on the dynamic parameter. While assuring system control precision, the algorithm can avoid unnecessary communication consumption between the control center and the spacecraft itself to a certain extent. Compared with the traditional static event-trigger algorithm, the proposed dynamic parameter-based event-trigger algorithm has the advantage of reducing the communication frequency. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed control algorithm is verified by theoretical analysis and simulation experiments.
- 参考文献/References:
-
[1] 耿远卓, 李传江, 郭延宁, 等. 单推力航天器交会对接轨迹规划及跟踪控制[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(9): 186–200
GENG Yuanzhuo, LI Chuanjiang, GUO Yanning, et al. Rendezvous and docking of spacecraft with single thruster: path planning and tracking control[J]. Acta aeronautica et astronautica sinica, 2020, 41(9): 186–200
[2] 黄宇嵩, 田栋, 李洪珏, 等. 一种翻滚非合作航天器抵近绕飞避障轨迹规划和跟踪控制方法[J]. 空间控制技术与应用, 2021, 47(3): 1–8
HUANG Yusong, TIAN Dong, LI Hongjue, et al. A trajectory planning and tracking algorithm for the tumbling non-cooperative spacecraft approach, flying-around and obstacle avoidance[J]. Aerospace control and application, 2021, 47(3): 1–8
[3] ZHANG Kai, LIU Yang, TAN Jiubin. Semiglobal finite-time stabilization of saturated spacecraft rendezvous system by dynamic event-triggered and self-triggered control[J]. IEEE transactions on aerospace and electronic systems, 2022, 58(6): 5030–5042.
[4] QU Qingyu, LIU Kexin, WANG Wei, et al. Spacecraft proximity maneuvering and rendezvous with collision avoidance based on reinforcement learning[J]. IEEE transactions on aerospace and electronic systems, 2022, 58(6): 5823–5834.
[5] 易中贵, 戈新生. 间接Legendre伪谱法的欠驱动航天器姿态运动轨迹跟踪[J]. 宇航学报, 2018, 39(6): 648–655
YI Zhonggui, GE Xinsheng. Attitude motion trajectory tracking for underactuated spacecraft based on indirect Legendre pesudospectral method[J]. Journal of astronautics, 2018, 39(6): 648–655
[6] YUAN Shuo, YU Chengpu, SUN Jian. Adaptive event-triggered consensus control of linear multi-agent systems with cyber attacks[J]. Neurocomputing, 2021, 442: 1–9.
[7] WANG Xin, YANG Huilan, ZHONG Shouming. Improved results on consensus of nonlinear MASs with nonhomogeneous Markov switching topologies and DoS cyber attacks[J]. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 2021, 358(14): 7237–7253.
[8] WU Baolin, CAO Xibin. Robust attitude tracking control for spacecraft with quantized torques[J]. IEEE transactions on aerospace and electronic systems, 2018, 54(2): 1020–1028.
[9] HOU Linlin, SUN Haibin. Anti-disturbance attitude control of flexible spacecraft with quantized states[J]. Aerospace science and technology, 2020, 99: 105760.
[10] 张凯, 周彬. 离散输入受限系统的增益调度事件触发和自触发控制[J]. 控制与决策, 2022, 37(6): 1489–1496
ZHANG Kai, ZHOU Bin. Gain scheduled event-triggered and self-triggered control of discrete-time input constrained systems[J]. Control and decision, 2022, 37(6): 1489–1496
[11] 王帅磊, 周绍磊, 代飞扬, 等. 多航天器分布式事件触发分组姿态协同控制[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2021, 47(2): 323–332
WANG Shuailei, ZHOU Shaolei, DAI Feiyang, et al. Distributed event-triggered group attitude coordinated control of multi-spacecraft[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2021, 47(2): 323–332
[12] 王志文, 陈万杰, 孙洪涛. 双端动态事件触发下信息物理系统输出反馈H∞控制[J]. 兰州理工大学学报, 2022, 48(3): 77–85
WANG Zhiwen, CHEN Wanjie, SUN Hongtao. Output feedback H∞ control of cyber-physical systems triggered by two terminal dynamic events[J]. Journal of Lanzhou University of Technology, 2022, 48(3): 77–85
[13] 田嘉旭. 基于细胞卫星的航天器姿态接管控制方法研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2019.
TIAN Jiaxu. Spacecraft Attittude Takeover Control Via Cellular Satellites[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2019.
[14] XU Chuang, WU Baolin, CAO Xibin, et al. Distributed adaptive event-triggered control for attitude synchronization of multiple spacecraft[J]. Nonlinear dynamics, 2019, 95(4): 2625–2638.
[15] SHI Yongxia, HU Qinglei, SHAO Xiaodong, et al. Adaptive neural coordinated control for multiple euler-lagrange systems with periodic event-triggered sampling[J]. IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems, 2023, 34(11): 8791–8801.
[16] LEE K W, SINGH S N. Noncertainty-equivalence spacecraft adaptive formation control with filtered signals[J]. Journal of aerospace engineering, 2017, 30(5): 04017029.
[17] 马鸣宇, 董朝阳, 马思迁, 等. 多航天器反步滑模SO(3)协同控制[J]. 宇航学报, 2018, 39(6): 664–673
MA Mingyu, DONG Chaoyang, MA Siqian, et al. Coordinated attitude control of multiple spacecraft via backstepping sliding mode method on SO(3)[J]. Journal of astronautics, 2018, 39(6): 664–673
[18] ZHANG Chengxi, WANG Jihe, ZHANG Dexin, et al. Fault-tolerant adaptive finite-time attitude synchronization and tracking control for multi-spacecraft formation[J]. Aerospace science and technology, 2018, 73: 197–209.
[19] HUANG Bing, LI Aijun, GUO Yong, et al. Rotation matrix based finite-time attitude synchronization control for spacecraft with external disturbances[J]. ISA transactions, 2019, 85: 141–150.
[20] GAO Shihong, LIU Xiaoping, JING Yuanwei, et al. A novel finite-time prescribed performance control scheme for spacecraft attitude tracking[J]. Aerospace science and technology, 2021, 118: 107044.
[21] SHI Xiaoning, ZHOU Zhigang, ZHOU Di. Finite-time attitude trajectory tracking control of rigid spacecraft[J]. IEEE transactions on aerospace and electronic systems, 2017, 53(6): 2913–2923.
[22] XU Chuang, WU Baolin, ZHANG Yingchun. Distributed prescribed-time attitude cooperative control for multiple spacecraft[J]. Aerospace science and technology, 2021, 113: 106699.
[23] WANG Tianqi, HUANG Jie. Leader-following event-triggered adaptive practical consensus of multiple rigid spacecraft systems over jointly connected networks[J]. IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems, 2021, 32(12): 5623–5632.
[24] YE Hefu, SONG Yongduan. Backstepping design embedded with time-varying command filters[J]. IEEE transactions on circuits and systems II:express briefs, 2022, 69(6): 2832–2836.
[25] HU Qinglei, SHAO Xiaodong, CHEN Wenhua. Robust fault-tolerant tracking control for spacecraft proximity operations using time-varying sliding mode[J]. IEEE transactions on aerospace and electronic systems, 2018, 54(1): 2–17.
[26] HU Qinglei, SHI Yongxia. Event-based coordinated control of spacecraft formation flying under limited communication[J]. Nonlinear dynamics, 2020, 99(3): 2139–2159.
[27] HU Qinglei, SHI Yongxia, WANG Chenliang. Event-based formation coordinated control for multiple spacecraft under communication constraints[J]. IEEE transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics:systems, 2021, 51(5): 3168–3179.
[28] CAO Ye, CAO Jianfu, SONG Yongduan. Practical prescribed time control of euler–lagrange systems with partial/full state constraints: a settling time regulator-based approach[J]. IEEE transactions on cybernetics, 2022, 52(12): 13096–13105.
[29] GUO Yong, SONG Shenmin. Finite-time control for formation flying spacecraft with coupled attitude and translational dynamics[C]//2013 10th IEEE International Conference on Control and Automation. Hangzhou: IEEE, 2013: 89–94.
[30] ZHANG Jianqiao, YE Dong, BIGGS J D, et al. Finite-time relative orbit-attitude tracking control for multi-spacecraft with collision avoidance and changing network topologies[J]. Advances in space research, 2019, 63(3): 1161-1175.
[31] LU Yu, SU Rong, ZHANG Chengxi, et al. Event-triggered adaptive formation keeping and interception scheme for autonomous surface vehicles under malicious attacks[J]. IEEE transactions on industrial informatics, 2022, 18(6): 3947–3957.
- 相似文献/References:
-
[1]张文辉,周启航,齐乃明.模糊CMAC的柔性空间机器人轨迹跟踪自学习控制[J].智能系统学报,2012,7(5):457.
ZHANG Wenhui,ZHOU Qihang,QI Naiming.Trajectory tracking selfstudy control for flexible space manipulators with fuzzy CMAC[J].CAAI Transactions on Intelligent Systems,2012,7():457.
[2]陈建平,王建彬,杨宜民.基于大脑情感学习的四轮驱动机器人速度补偿控制[J].智能系统学报,2013,8(4):361.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-4785.201303030]
CHEN Jianping,WANG Jianbin,YANG Yimin.Velocity compensation control for a four-wheel drive robot based on brain emotional learning[J].CAAI Transactions on Intelligent Systems,2013,8():361.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-4785.201303030]
[3]赵新华,王璞,陈晓红.投球机器人模糊PID控制[J].智能系统学报,2015,10(3):399.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-4785.201404041]
ZHAO Xinhua,WANG Pu,CHEN Xiaohong.Fuzzy PID control of pitching robots[J].CAAI Transactions on Intelligent Systems,2015,10():399.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-4785.201404041]
[4]张毅,陈起,罗元.室内环境下移动机器人三维视觉SLAM[J].智能系统学报,2015,10(4):615.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-4785.201504003]
ZHANG Yi,CHEN Qi,LUO Yuan.Three dimensional visual SLAM for mobile robots in indoor environments[J].CAAI Transactions on Intelligent Systems,2015,10():615.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-4785.201504003]
[5]马利民.欠驱动AUV全局无抖振滑模轨迹跟踪控制[J].智能系统学报,2016,11(2):200.[doi:10.11992/tis.201512015]
MA Limin.Global chattering-free sliding mode trajectory tracking control of underactuated autonomous underwater vehicles[J].CAAI Transactions on Intelligent Systems,2016,11():200.[doi:10.11992/tis.201512015]
[6]赵杰,蔡成涛,乔人杰.未知扰动下的无人水面艇有限时间动态预设性能控制[J].智能系统学报,2023,18(4):849.[doi:10.11992/tis.202209031]
ZHAO Jie,CAI Chengtao,QIAO Renjie.Finite-time dynamic prescribed performance control for surface unmanned vehicles with unknow disturbances[J].CAAI Transactions on Intelligent Systems,2023,18():849.[doi:10.11992/tis.202209031]
[7]吴启龙,朱齐丹.基于线性自抗扰控制的纵向舰载机直接升力全自动着舰控制[J].智能系统学报,2024,19(1):142.[doi:10.11992/tis.202304047]
WU Qilong,ZHU Qidan.Direct lift fully-automatic landing control of longitudinal carrier-based aircraft on basis of linear active disturbance rejection control[J].CAAI Transactions on Intelligent Systems,2024,19():142.[doi:10.11992/tis.202304047]
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2022-07-11。
作者简介:郝勇，副教授，主要研究方向为航天器姿态控制与航天器任务规划技术。目前主持黑龙江省自然科学基金项目1项、航天院所合作项目3项，获省部级科技发明一等奖1项、省级奖励二等奖1项，以第一发明人获授权发明专利2项，发表学术论文20余 篇。E-mail: haoyong@hrbeu.edu.cn;贾登辉，硕士研究生，主要研究方向为自适应控制、反步控制。E-mail: jiadenghui2410@163.com;李俊，博士研究生，主要研究方向为自适应控制、编队协同控制。发表学术论文7篇。E-mail: lijun1221@hrbeu.edu.cn
通讯作者:郝勇. E-mail: haoyong@hrbeu.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update:
1900-01-01